lunes, 11 de febrero de 2013

THIS AMERICAN LIFE


Understanding a chunk of literature as complex as Shakespearian language is something that takes talent. And the people form this podcast understand the characters and the depth of their personalities more than I did in class discussions with my classmates. I found it exceedingly interesting to hear how the prisoners discussed the prison scene in the novel and compare it to their situation, and the whole controversy of gay and not gay within the prison environment. This proves a very interesting point that is constantly mentioned within Shakespeare discussions; how relevant the characters’ personalities and lives are to the lives and personalities of people now a days.
I not only believe that the prisoners in the podcast understand this deeply, but also I see that they grasp those details and are able to analyze them as much or maybe more than we can as an AP literature class.  

martes, 5 de febrero de 2013

PRUFROCK AND HAMLET


Poetry has multiple qualities that make it stand out as one of the most beautiful ways of writing out there. And a detail that truly captures readers are the monologues of the main characters, not only because they speak beautifully, but because they are the little pieces of the poems or plays where readers can see exactly what the character is saying. Shakespeare is no exception of this, and one of his most famous monologues is from his brilliant play, Hamlet. Hamlet goes through a lot, and it is extremely important for readers to read deep into his monologues to be able to truly understand what he is thinking. The other monologue worth discussing is “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S Eliot. It’s a beautiful poem where Prufrock expresses his feelings and thoughts. Therefore it is completely worthwhile to compare these two masterpieces and identify what sets them apart.

The important thing to look at when comparing Shakespeare with any other literary work is that most of the monologues of these characters have some purpose behind it. For example when Hamlet is speaking to himself in the play, he considers things, he thinks ideas over and over again, and he feels as he speaks. On the other hand, Prufrock is speaking what he thinks just as the ideas appear in his mind. On the other hand, Prufrock does something very interesting that Shakespeare doesn’t which is talk about his surroundings. This main detail is probably the most accurate one that backs up the idea that the only thing Prufrock is expressing is his thoughts and the impact his surroundings have on him. Shakespeare does not express that on Hamlet. Hamlet is so lost within his own thought, that when it comes to speaking his mind, he doesn’t acknowledge that there is something else out there aside from his thoughts, feelings and experiences. This aspect clearly draws the line between the trains of thought of these two deeply intellectual men.